If you've tried to sell cheap herbs, cloth, or leather in WoW: Forever recently, you may have noticed something that doesn't match Blizzard's patch notes: the Auction House is still asking for a 1-silver deposit.
Blizzard's November 10 hotfix notes listed a reduction in the minimum deposit from 1 silver to 1 copper, with the change intended to take effect after realm restarts. Yet players testing the Auction House on November 11 reported that the old 1-silver charge was still being applied.
The change itself is not in doubt. Principal Game Designer Kris Zierhut had already said the team planned to bring the minimum back down to 1 copper. The problem is getting that adjustment to work on live realms.
November 17 is currently being discussed as the expected next rollout window, but players should not treat that date as an officially confirmed Blizzard deadline. Until the lower amount appears in the posting window, the safest assumption is that the old minimum still applies.
For players trying to build up WoW Forever Gold, this is more than a minor Auction House adjustment. It determines whether listing inexpensive materials is worth the risk at all.
Why Is WoW Forever Still Charging 1 Silver per Auction?
The confusion started with Blizzard's November 10 hotfix announcement.
Under the Auction House section, Blizzard listed three changes:
-
The minimum deposit was adjusted to 1 copper, down from 1 silver.
-
Unread mail would no longer incorrectly appear to come from Stormwind Auction House.
-
A bug causing some mail to arrive in roughly two minutes instead of the intended 60 minutes was fixed.
The deposit adjustment was supposed to happen with realm restarts. However, players soon reported that the Auction House was still charging 1 silver.
One player reported that the minimum had not changed after the weekly reset. Another described a simple test: disable addons, place a cheap cloth or herb in the Auction House's Sell tab, and check the deposit. The result was still 1 silver, and that amount was deducted when the auction was posted.
A separate discussion raised the same issue using an item worth just 18 copper to a vendor. Listing it required a 1-silver deposit, making the cost several times higher than the item's guaranteed vendor value.
These reports explain why players are questioning the hotfix. Blizzard's notes announced the lower minimum, but the in-game behavior reported by players did not match the announcement.
| Auction House detail | Previous setting | Announced change | Reported result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum deposit | 1 silver | 1 copper | Still 1 silver in player tests |
| Cheap material listings | 1 silver minimum | Lower minimum under the Classic formula | Old charge reported |
| Expected next rollout | Not applicable | Change announced with realm restarts | November 17 currently being discussed |
The exact reason the adjustment did not appear as expected has not been established by the available reports. It is better to describe this as a rollout problem than to assume Blizzard deliberately reversed the change or to speculate about why it happened.
Why a 1-Silver Deposit Is Such a Problem for New Characters
One silver does not sound like much to a level 60 character. Early in WoW: Forever, it can be a meaningful amount of money.
New characters need silver for class training, bags, repairs, professions, and eventually mount training. Gathering materials and selling them is one way to build that early budget, but a high minimum deposit makes inexpensive listings risky.
The issue is especially clear when an item is worth only a few copper to a vendor. If you list it and nobody buys it, you lose the deposit when the auction expires. Cancel the listing yourself, and you lose the deposit as well. It is returned only when the auction sells.
That creates an awkward choice: list cheap materials and risk losing silver, or sell them directly to a vendor and give up the chance of earning more from another player.
The standard WoW Classic deposit formula is based on an item's vendor price and the duration of the listing:
| Auction duration | Deposit |
|---|---|
| 2 hours | 5% of vendor price |
| 8 hours | 20% of vendor price |
| 24 hours | 60% of vendor price |
For example, a Fine Leather Tunic with a vendor value of 4 silver and 61 copper would normally require about 92 copper for an 8-hour auction under that formula.
With a 1-silver minimum, the player instead pays 100 copper.
The difference is only 8 copper in this particular example, but the impact is much larger for items with very low vendor values. An item worth 18 copper, for instance, can still require a full silver to list under the old minimum.
The deposit is not a sales tax: it comes back when the item sells. The real risk is paying it repeatedly on auctions that expire or get cancelled.
What the 1-Copper Change Could Mean for WoW Forever Gold
The planned reduction should make low-value Auction House listings more practical, especially during the early stages of progression.
Gatherers could list smaller amounts of herbs, cloth, ore, and leather without facing the same flat 1-silver entry cost. Crafters could also have more opportunities to buy inexpensive materials from other players instead of relying entirely on vendors.
For players working toward level 40 mount training, every bit of saved silver helps. The same applies to anyone trying to level professions without draining their entire bank.
There are three groups likely to notice the difference most:
Gatherers: Low-level materials become less expensive to list when their calculated deposit falls below 1 silver. That makes it easier to test whether an item has buyers without risking as much money.
New characters: Failed auctions become less punishing for items with low vendor values. A few unsuccessful listings should no longer carry the same flat minimum cost once the change is active.
Crafters and regular buyers: More inexpensive materials may become available through player listings if sellers no longer feel forced to vendor everything.
That does not mean every herb or piece of cloth will become profitable. Auction House demand, competition, stack size, and listing duration still matter. A low deposit makes an auction cheaper to post; it does not guarantee that someone will buy it.
For anyone building WoW Forever Gold, the important improvement is a lower cost of trying to sell materials that other players might actually need.
What About the Two-Minute Mail Delivery Bug?
The mail changes appeared in the same November 10 hotfix entry, but they should be treated as a separate issue from the Auction House deposit.
Blizzard listed a fix for some mail arriving in roughly two minutes rather than the intended 60-minute delivery time. It also addressed unread mail incorrectly showing Stormwind Auction House as the sender.
The 60-minute timing is the intended behavior described in Blizzard's notes. However, the player reports confirming the Auction House deposit problem do not establish whether the mail fixes were also delayed or rolled back.
That distinction matters if you regularly send materials between characters or accounts. Do not assume that the mail system's current behavior is tied to the deposit issue simply because both changes appeared in the same hotfix announcement.
For the latest status, check the actual delivery behavior in-game and Blizzard's updated hotfix notes rather than relying on assumptions about a shared rollout.
How to Avoid Losing Silver Before the Deposit Changes
Until the 1-copper minimum is visibly active on your realm, a little caution can save money.
-
Bundle cheap materials: Avoid listing individual pieces of cloth, herbs, or ore if each listing costs 1 silver. A sensible stack can spread the deposit across more items.
-
Check the posting fee first: Look at the deposit shown in the Sell tab before confirming. Patch notes are not a substitute for checking what the game actually charges.
-
Avoid unnecessary cancellations: If you cancel an auction to chase a small undercut, you lose the deposit. Reposting repeatedly can cost more than the extra sale price is worth.
-
Compare with vendor value: If an item has little demand and the deposit is higher than the likely profit, selling it to an NPC may be the safer choice.
-
Recheck after maintenance: November 17 is the currently discussed target for the expected change. Confirm the new minimum in the Auction House window before changing your selling strategy.
There is little benefit in risking more silver just because a hotfix note says a change should already be active.
When Will WoW Forever's Auction House Deposit Drop to 1 Copper?
Blizzard has confirmed the intended direction of the change, but the available official announcement does not establish November 17 as a guaranteed release date.
The earlier developer comments came from an interview with Crix. Kris Zierhut explained that the team had discussed the minimum deposit and decided to return it to 1 copper. His wording was straightforward: the change was coming, but it was not live yet. No exact date was given in that interview.
The November 10 hotfix notes subsequently listed the adjustment, but player reports showed that the 1-silver minimum remained in place after the announced restart.
For now, November 17 should be treated as an expected rollout window rather than a confirmed promise. The clearest sign that the change has finally arrived will be the deposit shown when you place a low-value item in the Auction House.
The bottom line: Blizzard has announced the 1-copper minimum, and the developer has confirmed that the team wants to remove the 1-silver floor. But until the lower deposit actually appears in-game, players should continue treating 1 silver as the working minimum and avoid unnecessary risks when listing cheap materials.